PostgreSQL Floating-Point Numbers: Differences and use cases for REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION.

Floating-point numbers are used extensively in computing to represent non-integer numbers. Those familiar with databases and data types will often encounter decisions involving the choice between different types of floating-point representations. In PostgreSQL, two primary data types are used for floating-point numbers: REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION. Understanding their differences, benefits, and appropriate use cases is essential for effective database design, numerical accuracy, and performance optimization.

Overview of Floating-Point Numbers in PostgreSQL

In PostgreSQL, floating-point numbers are represented using two data types: REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION. These types distinguish how much space they consume and how they handle precision and scale. Let’s break down these types:

1. REAL

The REAL data type in PostgreSQL is a single-precision floating-point number. It usually takes up 4 bytes of storage and can handle up to 6 decimal digits of precision. This type is often chosen for applications where memory space is more critical than precision, such as rapid processing of large datasets with acceptable precision.

2. DOUBLE PRECISION

DOUBLE PRECISION, on the other hand, provides double the precision of the REAL data type. It typically uses 8 bytes of storage and can handle approximately 15 decimal digits of precision. This type is preferred when higher accuracy and larger value range are necessary, for instance, scientific calculations, financial data processing, and other applications where minute deviations can lead to significant errors.

Technical Differences

Understanding the technical differences between REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION can help in making an informed decision about which to use under different scenarios.

Storage Size and Precision

As mentioned earlier, REAL uses 4 bytes, while DOUBLE PRECISION uses 8 bytes. The choice between them should take into account the trade-offs between storage efficiency and precision requirements. Below is a simple example to illustrate the difference:


-- Create a table with both REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION columns
CREATE TABLE floating_point_test (
    real_column REAL,
    double_column DOUBLE PRECISION
);

-- Insert values into the table
INSERT INTO floating_point_test (real_column, double_column) VALUES
(123456.789012, 123456.789012);

-- Select the values back
SELECT * FROM floating_point_test;

 real_column |   double_column
-------------+---------------------
   123456.79 |    123456.789012
(1 row)

From the output, you can observe that the REAL column rounds off to fewer decimal places compared to the DOUBLE PRECISION column, illustrating the difference in precision.

Performance Considerations

There are perceptible differences in performance when using REAL vs. DOUBLE PRECISION, particularly when dealing with large datasets or operations requiring high computational resources. Calculations with REAL are generally faster due to the lower precision and smaller data size, which translates into quicker processing but with a trade-off in precision.

Use Cases

Choosing between REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION depends significantly on the specific requirements of your application.

Use Cases for REAL

  • Data Warehousing: When aggregating large volumes of data where slight precision loss is acceptable.
  • Graphics: Coordinates in graphic representations often do not require high precision.

Use Cases for DOUBLE PRECISION

  • Scientific Computing: Requires high precision for calculations, e.g., in physics simulations.
  • Financial Applications: Calculations where precision is crucial, such as interest calculations over long periods.

Conclusion

Choosing the right type of floating-point representation in PostgreSQL—REAL or DOUBLE PRECISION—depends on the specific needs of both the application and the data it processes. While REAL is sufficient for many applications and beneficial in terms of storage and performance, DOUBLE PRECISION is indispensable for scenarios demanding high precision and range. Ultimately, understanding the differences and use cases of these data types can lead to more effective and efficient database solutions.

About Editorial Team

Our Editorial Team is made up of tech enthusiasts deeply skilled in Apache Spark, PySpark, and Machine Learning, alongside proficiency in Pandas, R, Hive, PostgreSQL, Snowflake, and Databricks. They're not just experts; they're passionate educators, dedicated to demystifying complex data concepts through engaging and easy-to-understand tutorials.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top