Spark Repartition() vs Coalesce(): Optimizing Data Partitioning in Apache Spark

Spark Repartition() vs Coalesce(): – In Apache Spark, both repartition() and coalesce() are methods used to control the partitioning of data in a Resilient Distributed Dataset (RDD) or a DataFrame. Proper partitioning can have a significant impact on the performance and efficiency of your Spark job. These methods serve different purposes and have distinct use cases:

Apache Spark repartition()

• repartition(<code>numPartitions: Int) is used to increase or decrease the number of partitions in an RDD or DataFrame.
• It is typically used when you want to increase parallelism or evenly distribute the data across a certain number of partitions.
• If you increase the number of partitions using repartition(), Spark will perform a full shuffle, which can be a costly operation.
• It’s useful when you need to redistribute data for load balancing, or when you want to increase the parallelism for operations like joins or aggregations.

Spark repartition Example

val rdd = // your RDD
val repartitionedRdd = rdd.repartition(8) // Repartition into 8 partitions

coalesce() in Apache Spark

• coalesce(<code>numPartitions: Int, shuffle: Boolean = false) is used to reduce the number of partitions in an RDD or DataFrame. It’s also used for repartitioning but with the goal of reducing the number of partitions, as opposed to increasing it.
• By default, coalesce() does not trigger a shuffle. However, you can force a shuffle by setting the shuffle parameter to true. If you don’t shuffle, it will try to coalesce partitions by moving data within the same executor, which is more efficient than a full shuffle.
• coalesce() is often used to optimize the performance of Spark jobs by reducing the number of partitions when you have too many partitions that are not necessary.

Spark coalesce Example

val rdd = // your RDD
val coalescedRdd = rdd.coalesce(4) // Reduce partitions to 4 without shuffling

RDD – Complete Example of Spark repartition() vs coalesce()

Here’s a complete example in Scala that demonstrates the use of both repartition() and coalesce() in Apache Spark:

import org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession

object RepartitionVsCoalesceExample{
  def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
    // Create a SparkSession, which is the entry point for Spark functionality.
    val spark = SparkSession.builder()
      .appName("RepartitionVsCoalesceExample")
      .master("local")
      .getOrCreate()

    // Create an RDD with 8 partitions
    val data = 1 to 30
    val rdd = spark.sparkContext.parallelize(data, 8)
    println("Initial number of partitions: " + rdd.getNumPartitions)
    rdd.mapPartitionsWithIndex(printDataInPartition).count()

    // Repartition the RDD into 4 partitions
    val repartitionedRdd = rdd.repartition(4)
    println("Number of partitions after repartition: " + repartitionedRdd.getNumPartitions)
    repartitionedRdd.mapPartitionsWithIndex(printDataInPartition).count()

    // Coalesce the RDD to 2 partitions without shuffling, 
    // Here partitions reduced to 2 from 4, partition 3 data will move to 1 and partition 4 data will move to 2.
    val coalescedRdd = repartitionedRdd.coalesce(2, shuffle = false)
    println("Number of partitions after coalesce without shuffle: " + coalescedRdd.getNumPartitions)
    coalescedRdd.mapPartitionsWithIndex(printDataInPartition).count()

    // Coalesce the RDD to 2 partitions with shuffling
    val shuffledCoalescedRdd = coalescedRdd.coalesce(2, shuffle = true)
    println("Number of partitions after shuffled coalesce: " + shuffledCoalescedRdd.getNumPartitions)
    shuffledCoalescedRdd.mapPartitionsWithIndex(printDataInPartition).count()

    spark.stop()
  }

  // Define a function to print the data in each partition
  def printDataInPartition(index: Int, iterator: Iterator[Int]): Iterator[Unit] = {
    val partitionData = iterator.toList
    val i  = index +1
    println(s"Partition $i: ${partitionData.mkString(", ")}")
    Iterator.empty
  }
}
/* Output
Initial number of partitions: 8
Partition 1: 1, 2, 3
Partition 2: 4, 5, 6, 7
Partition 3: 8, 9, 10, 11
Partition 4: 12, 13, 14, 15
Partition 5: 16, 17, 18
Partition 6: 19, 20, 21, 22
Partition 7: 23, 24, 25, 26
Partition 8: 27, 28, 29, 30
Number of partitions after repartition: 4
Partition 1: 7, 8, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29
Partition 2: 1, 4, 9, 14, 18, 20, 24, 30
Partition 3: 2, 5, 10, 15, 21, 25, 27
Partition 4: 3, 6, 11, 12, 16, 22, 26, 28
Number of partitions after coalesce: 2
Partition 1: 7, 8, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 2, 5, 10, 15, 21, 25, 27
Partition 2: 1, 4, 9, 14, 18, 20, 24, 30, 3, 6, 11, 12, 16, 22, 26, 28
Number of partitions after shuffled coalesce: 2
Partition 1: 8, 17, 23, 2, 10, 21, 27, 4, 14, 20, 30, 6, 12, 22, 28
Partition 2: 7, 13, 19, 29, 5, 15, 25, 1, 9, 18, 24, 3, 11, 16, 26
*/

Difference between coalesce and repartition

coalesce and repartition are both methods in Apache Spark used to control the number of partitions in an RDD (Resilient Distributed Dataset) or DataFrame. However, there are key differences between the two:

1. Number of Partitions:
   • repartition: It is used to increase or decrease the number of partitions. You specify the desired number of partitions as an argument.
   • coalesce: It is primarily used to reduce the number of partitions. You also specify the target number of partitions as an argument, which is typically fewer than the current number of partitions.
2. Shuffling:
   • repartition: It performs a full shuffle, meaning that it redistributes the data across the specified number of partitions by reshuffling the data. This can be a costly operation when increasing the number of partitions.
   • coalesce: By default, it does not shuffle the data. It tries to minimize data movement by coalescing partitions within the same executor node. However, you can opt for a shuffle by setting the shuffle parameter to true.
3. Performance:
   • repartition: It is generally more resource-intensive and time-consuming because it involves a full shuffle of data across the cluster.
   • coalesce: It is often more efficient and faster when reducing the number of partitions because it avoids a full shuffle.
4. Use Cases:
   • repartition: It is suitable when you need to significantly change the number of partitions, redistribute data for load balancing, or increase parallelism for operations like joins and aggregations.
   • coalesce: It is preferred when you want to optimize performance by reducing the number of partitions without incurring the overhead of a full shuffle.

DataFrame repartition and coalesce

Unlike RDDs, where you can explicitly specify the number of partitions when creating them, DataFrames and Datasets in Apache Spark do not allow you to specify the number of partitions explicitly during their creation. Instead, the number of partitions for DataFrames and Datasets is determined by Spark’s internal logic and is based on several factors including:

1. DataFrame Sources: The number of partitions may depend on the source from which you are reading data. For example, if you are reading data from a file, the number of partitions may be determined by the number of file blocks.
2. Cluster Configuration: The number of available cores and resources in your Spark cluster can also influence the default number of partitions. Spark will try to distribute the data across available resources for parallelism.
3. DataFrame Operations: The number of partitions can change as you apply various DataFrame operations, such as filter, groupBy, and repartition. These operations can modify the partitioning of the data.
4. Optimizations: Spark may apply various optimizations during query planning that can affect the number of partitions.

Because of these factors, the default number of partitions for DataFrames and Datasets is typically determined automatically by Spark’s execution plan and resource availability.

If you need more control over the number of partitions, you can use the repartition or coalesce methods, as demonstrated in the below example. These methods allow you to explicitly specify the number of partitions after creating the DataFrame, based on your specific use case and requirements.

Complete Example of Data Frame repartition() and coalesce()

import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame, SparkSession}
import org.apache.spark.sql.Row
import org.apache.spark.TaskContext

object DataFrameRepartitionAndCoalesce {
  def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
    val spark = SparkSession.builder()
      .appName("DataFrameCoalesceAndRepartition")
      .master("local[*]")
      .getOrCreate()

    spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("ERROR")

    // Create a DataFrame with some sample data
    val data = Seq(
      (1, "Alice"),
      (2, "Anna"),
      (3, "Bill"),
      (4, "Bob"),
      (5, "Charlie"),
      (6, "David"),
      (7, "Eve"),
      (8, "Frank")
    )
    val columns = Seq("ID", "Name")

    val df = spark.createDataFrame(data).toDF(columns: _*)
    val initialPartitions = df.rdd.partitions.length
    println(s"Initial number of partitions: $initialPartitions")
    // Apply the function to each partition using foreachPartition
    df.rdd.foreachPartition(printDataInPartitions)

    // Repartition the DataFrame into 4 partitions
    val repartitionedDf = df.repartition(4)
    val partitionsAfterRepartition = repartitionedDf.rdd.partitions.length
    println(s"Number of partitions after repartition: $partitionsAfterRepartition")
    repartitionedDf.rdd.foreachPartition(printDataInPartitions)

    // Coalesce the DataFrame into 2 partitions
    val  coalesceDf = df.coalesce(2)
    val partitionsAfterCoalesce = coalesceDf.rdd.partitions.length
    println(s"Number of partitions after coalesce: $partitionsAfterCoalesce")
    coalesceDf.rdd.foreachPartition(printDataInPartitions)
    spark.stop()
  }

  // Define a function to print data in each partition grouped by partition index
  def printDataInPartitions(iter: Iterator[Row]): Unit = {
    val partitionIndex = TaskContext.getPartitionId() + 1
    val data = iter.map(row => row.mkString(", ")).mkString("\n")
    println(s"Partition $partitionIndex Data:\n$data\n")
  }
}
/*
Output
-----------------------
Initial number of partitions: 2
Partition 1 Data:
1, Alice
2, Anna
3, Bill
4, Bob

Partition 2 Data:
5, Charlie
6, David
7, Eve
8, Frank

Number of partitions after repartition: 4
Partition 1 Data:
1, Alice
5, Charlie

Partition 2 Data:
2, Anna
8, Frank

Partition 3 Data:
4, Bob
6, David

Partition 4 Data:
3, Bill
7, Eve

Number of partitions after coalesce: 2
Partition 1 Data:
1, Alice
2, Anna
3, Bill
4, Bob

Partition 2 Data:
5, Charlie
6, David
7, Eve
8, Frank

*/

repartition() vs coalesce() – Conclusion

In summary, the choice between repartition() and coalesce() depends on whether you want to increase or decrease the number of partitions and whether you can afford a shuffle operation. repartition() is more suitable when you need to change the number of partitions significantly, while coalesce() is preferred when you want to optimize performance by reducing the number of partitions without incurring a costly shuffle, especially when reducing the number of partitions.

About Editorial Team

Our Editorial Team is made up of tech enthusiasts deeply skilled in Apache Spark, PySpark, and Machine Learning, alongside proficiency in Pandas, R, Hive, PostgreSQL, Snowflake, and Databricks. They're not just experts; they're passionate educators, dedicated to demystifying complex data concepts through engaging and easy-to-understand tutorials.